Glove / Field study No. 01
Nearly half the commercial sales on the record aren't sales.
We counted the Sarasota County certified tax roll — 304,544 live parcels, 10,934 of them commercial or industrial — looking for the places where the public record says one thing and means another. Four of them are big enough to cost you a deal. Here is how often each one happens, and how to check it yourself.
Share or cite:LinkedInXCite, link or embed ↓
Disclosure: Sterling Digital Partners also makes Glove. The first five packets are free. Paid plans are coming; contact us if you need more now. This research is free, uses only public records, and every figure can be checked without Glove.
Key takeaways
Every figure below is a row in sarasota-commercial-record-2026-09.csv, the counts file published with this study. Free to quote with attribution and a link.
- 44.5% of commercial sales recorded in Sarasota County, Florida since 1 January 2024 — 1,054 of 2,368 — carry a Florida Department of Revenue code other than qualified.Sarasota County certified roll dated 18 September 2026, counted 19 September 2026
- 30.6% of commercial sales recorded in Sarasota County, Florida since 1 January 2024 — 725 of 2,368 — were recorded at a price of $100 or less.Sarasota County certified roll dated 18 September 2026, counted 19 September 2026
- 735 of the 2,368 commercial sales recorded in Sarasota County, Florida since 1 January 2024 carry qualification code 11: corrective, quit claim or tax deed, no consideration.Sarasota County certified roll dated 18 September 2026, counted 19 September 2026
- 66.8% of Sarasota County commercial and industrial parcels with a SARASOTA situs city — 4,301 of 6,442 — are in unincorporated Sarasota County, not the City of Sarasota.Sarasota County certified roll dated 18 September 2026, counted 19 September 2026
- 78.5% of all live Sarasota County parcels with a SARASOTA situs city — 101,809 of 129,734 — are in unincorporated Sarasota County.Sarasota County certified roll dated 18 September 2026, counted 19 September 2026
- 20.7% of Sarasota County commercial and industrial parcels — 2,265 of 10,933 — are assessed below 75% of just value.Sarasota County certified roll dated 18 September 2026, counted 19 September 2026
- 40.8% of Sarasota County commercial and industrial parcels — 4,458 of 10,933 — are assessed below 90% of just value.Sarasota County certified roll dated 18 September 2026, counted 19 September 2026
- 97.0% is the median ratio of assessed value to just value across Sarasota County commercial and industrial parcels; the median taxable-to-just ratio is 96.0%.Sarasota County certified roll dated 18 September 2026, counted 19 September 2026
- $1.58 billion separates just value from assessed value across Sarasota County commercial and industrial parcels — 9.1% of $17.27bn in just value.Sarasota County certified roll dated 18 September 2026, counted 19 September 2026
- 337 of 230,059 distinct Sarasota County address keys — house number, street and situs city — resolve to two or more non-blank directional prefixes.Sarasota County certified roll dated 18 September 2026, counted 19 September 2026
- 950 Sarasota County parcels sit behind an address that returns more than one property once the directional prefix is dropped.Sarasota County certified roll dated 18 September 2026, counted 19 September 2026
- 10,934 of Sarasota County's 304,544 live parcels are commercial or industrial — 3.6%, by DOR use code 1000–4999.Sarasota County certified roll dated 18 September 2026, counted 19 September 2026
Finding 01 / Comparable sales
Nearly half the recorded commercial sales are not qualified as arm's-length.
What share of recorded commercial sales in Sarasota County are not qualified as arm's-length?
44.5% — 1,054 of the 2,368 sales recorded against commercial and industrial parcels in Sarasota County since 1 January 2024 carry a Department of Revenue code other than qualified. Separately, 725 of the 2,368 were recorded at a price of $100 or less.
Of 2,368 sales recorded against commercial and industrial parcels since 1 January 2024, 1,054 carry a Department of Revenue code other than qualified — for all but the 57 still pending (code 99), the appraiser has examined the deed and concluded the transaction does not represent an open-market sale. The single largest group is code 11: corrective deeds, quit claims, tax deeds and transfers for no consideration. There are 735 of those alone.
A further 91 are transfers between affiliated parties, 58 convey a partial interest, and 35 are marked as not exposed to the open market. Eleven further codes account for the remaining 108 sales — 30 qualified, 78 not — and none of them reaches 30 rows. Nineteen distinct codes appear in the window; the table below accounts for all 2,368 sales.
If you pull a sales history and read the prices without reading the qualification codes beside them, roughly two in five of the numbers you are looking at are not comparable sales. Some of them are $100.
Is that unusual? Almost certainly not. Non-arm’s-length transfers are a normal part of every county’s record — corrective deeds get filed, property moves between related entities, tax deeds are issued. That is exactly why the check matters. Nothing here claims Sarasota is an outlier. It counts how often the trap is present in one county, on a stated date, so you know what to expect before you read a sales history anywhere.
The breakdown
| Count | Code | What the appraiser recorded |
|---|---|---|
| 934 | 01 | Sale qualified as a result of deed examination |
| 735 | 11 | Corrective, quit claim, tax deed, no consideration |
| 295 | 05 | Qualified — multiple parcels |
| 91 | 30 | Transactions involving affiliated parties |
| 58 | 16 | Deeds conveying partial interest |
| 57 | 99 | Sale qualification decision pending |
| 55 | 02 | Sale qualified as a result of evidence |
| 35 | 37 | Not exposed to open market or parties not informed |
| 108 | — | 11 further codes, none above 29 rows: 30 qualified, 78 not |
| 2,368 | — | All commercial sales recorded in the window |
A Florida court has already put a number on one of these transfers. In S and A Property Investment Services, LLC v. Garcia, owners of a Miami property moved it by quitclaim deed to a company they wholly owned, with no money paid, to limit their personal liability. The Property Appraiser treated that as a change of ownership and removed the 10% assessment cap. The opinion records the result: assessed value rose from $104,023 in 2019 to $273,409 in 2020. The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed in March 2023.
The instrument in that case is the one sitting in your sales history. A deed with no money behind it is not a sale. It is still a transfer, and the record hands you the deed either way.
Fla. 3d DCA, No. 3D22-835, 15 March 2023. The owner there was hit by transferring, not by buying: the mechanism is the same and the fact pattern is not.
Check it yourself
Every sale row on a Sarasota appraiser card carries a qualification code. Open the parcel at the official property search, read the sales table, and treat any code outside 01–07 as a transfer rather than a sale until you have read the deed.
The code list ships inside the county's own bulk download as QualificationCodes.csv. It is the authority; nothing here replaces it.
Finding 02 / Jurisdiction
A Sarasota address usually isn't in the City of Sarasota.
Is a Sarasota address inside the City of Sarasota?
Usually not: of the 6,442 commercial and industrial parcels with a SARASOTA situs city, 4,301 (66.8%) are in unincorporated Sarasota County and only 2,141 (33.2%) are in the City of Sarasota.
129,734 live parcels print SARASOTA as their situs city. Only 27,925 of them are inside the City of Sarasota. The other 101,809 are in unincorporated Sarasota County — a different planning department, a different zoning code, a different permit portal, a different set of people to call.
Among commercial and industrial parcels the split is less lopsided but still the wrong way round for anyone assuming the city: of 6,442 commercial parcels with a Sarasota address, 4,301 are unincorporated and 2,141 are in the city.
Two out of three times, the zoning office you would call first about a Sarasota commercial address is the wrong one — and the map you check is the wrong map.
Check it yourself
The appraiser card prints a Municipality field. Read it before you pick a planning office, and copy it exactly as printed. The postal city on the address is not that field and never decides it.
Other counties tell applicants the same thing in writing. The City of Fort Walton Beach warns permit applicants that “your mailing address may state Fort Walton Beach, but you could still be outside of the city limits.” A routine feature of the record, not a Sarasota quirk.
We looked for a published account of someone losing money to this particular trap and did not find one. The counts above are what we have.
The same trap runs across the county line: 1302 Rome Ave, Sarasota, FL 34243 is parcel 6656500003 in unincorporated Manatee County. That one is worked in full in the field guide.
Finding 03 / Underwriting
One in five commercial parcels is assessed below three-quarters of its market value.
How far below market value are Sarasota County commercial parcels assessed?
The median commercial parcel is assessed at 97.0% of just value, but 2,265 of 10,933 (20.7%) are assessed below 75% of just value and 480 below half.
For most commercial parcels the gap is small — the median assessed value is 97% of just value, and the median taxable value is 96%. But the tail is long. 4,458 commercial parcels (40.8%) are assessed below 90% of just value, 2,265 (20.7%) below 75%, and 480 below half.
Across all 10,933 valued commercial parcels, just value totals $17.27bn and assessed value totals $15.69bn — a gap of $1.58 billion, or 9.1%.
Underwrite off the current tax bill on a parcel sitting in that tail and your first year's taxes can arrive materially higher than the number you modelled.
Florida caps annual assessment increases on non-homestead property at 10%, and the assessment resets toward just value on a qualifying change of ownership — which is why a long-held building often carries an assessment well below what the county thinks it is worth. But a gap between just and assessed value can also come from an agricultural classification, an exemption, or a correction in progress. The roll does not say which applies to a given parcel. Treat the gap as a question to ask, not a conclusion to model.
And the cap does not cap the bill. Florida’s 10% limit applies to non-school levies. School millage is calculated on market value. NBC6 Miami reported in October 2024 on a Miami commercial property whose assessed value rose exactly 10% while the tax bill rose 46%, from $13,606.85 to $19,804.39, because the school share went from $5,788.41 to $11,468.62 as market value reached $1.7m.
So the gap above understates the exposure. The appraiser publishes one assessed and one taxable figure without naming the basis. Because the cap applies only to non-school levies, a value below just value identifies the non-school basis — and of the 10,933 parcels counted here, none sits above just value and 5,901 sit below it. The school share of every one of these bills is computed on the higher number.
Reported 30 October 2024. The figures above describe the capped, non-school basis only.
Check it yourself
Read Just, Assessed and Taxable as three separate numbers under the headings the card prints, and record the year on the row. They are not interchangeable and collapsing them is the most common error in this record.
Then ask the Tax Collector what is actually billed. The appraiser sets value; the collector bills. Those are different offices and different numbers.
Finding 04 / Property match
337 addresses return more than one property if you drop the direction.
How often does one Sarasota County address return more than one property?
337 of 230,059 distinct address keys resolve to two or more non-blank directional prefixes, and 950 parcels sit behind them.
Across 230,059 distinct combinations of house number, street name and situs city, 337 resolve to two or more non-blank directional prefixes — N and S, or E and W, on the same numbered street. 950 parcels sit behind them.
They are not where you would guess. 152 of the 337 — 45% — are in Englewood, in dense residential and mobile-home street grids where short numbered streets repeat with different prefixes. Sarasota accounts for another 115, Venice 32. Tamiami Trail, the county’s main commercial corridor, holds 30 keys and Lockwood Ridge Road 7 — together 11%. The trap is not concentrated where the money is; it is concentrated where the street grid repeats.
A worked collision
| Account | Situs | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|
| 0001060002 | 6000 N Tamiami Trl, Sarasota | Sarasota County |
| 0103050018 | 6000 S Tamiami Trl, Sarasota | Sarasota County |
Two different commercial parcels, several miles apart, with different use codes and just values differing by more than $1.7m. An address written without the N or the S matches both.
This is the failure that doesn't announce itself. You get a record back, it looks right, and it belongs to a different building.
In March 2023 the City of Atlanta demolished a century-old house on Lawton Street. Its own demolition notice named Lawton Avenue, ZIP 30314 — a different street 1.4 miles away, in a different ZIP. The owner, Everett Tripodis, was then billed for the teardown: WSB-TV put the redemption amount, with interest, at more than $68,000.
A city with complete access to its own records destroyed the wrong building because a street suffix and a ZIP code did not match. That property is a house, and it is in Georgia. The trap is neither.
WSB-TV Atlanta, 29 March and 4 August 2023.
Check it yourself
Before you copy a single field, confirm the full situs and the parcel identifier against your subject — direction, unit and all. If a direction is missing from the address you were given, go back and ask for it. A returned result is not a match.
The other half of the market
Manatee County, counted the same way — and it is worse.
Sarasota–Bradenton is two counties. Everything above is Sarasota. This is Manatee, counted from the Florida Department of Revenue’s 2026 preliminary tax roll files for Manatee, DOR county 51 — the standard NAL and SDF, dated 27 July 2026 and downloaded 20 September 2026. 236,531 parcels, 7,277 of them commercial or industrial.
How does Manatee County compare with Sarasota County on the same checks?
Manatee is worse on both of the traps that turn on the record's own ambiguity: 55.5% of its commercial sales are not qualified against Sarasota's 47.1% on the matched window, and 1,892 of its address keys resolve to two or more directions against Sarasota's 337.
Side by side
| Count | Sarasota | Manatee |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial sales not qualified | 47.1% | 55.5% |
| Recorded at $100 or less | 31.2% | 35.5% |
| Commercial parcels | 10,934 | 7,277 |
| Assessed below 75% of just value | 20.7% | 14.9% |
| Just-to-assessed gap | $1.58bn | $509.7m |
| Address keys with 2+ directions | 337 | 1,892 |
Sales on a matched window, 2025 onward. Manatee’s sale file carries one roll cycle, not a history, so the 44.5% published above for Sarasota (2024 onward) is not the comparable figure — 47.1% is. Everything else is current roll against current roll.
Manatee is worse on the two traps that turn on the record’s own ambiguity. More than half its recorded commercial sales are not arm’s-length. And its address collisions run at 5.8 times Sarasota’s rate, because Bradenton’s numbered grid runs east, west, north-east and north-west: 4208 1st Ave is three different properties.
A Sarasota address, in Manatee County, in no city at all
13,665 parcels on Manatee’s roll print SARASOTA as their situs city. Every one of them is unincorporated. Not one sits inside a municipality, and none is in Sarasota County. 13,638 of them are ZIP 34243. 917 of the 13,665 are commercial or industrial, and all 917 of those are unincorporated too.
The same trap is larger in absolute terms one town over: 120,029 parcels print BRADENTON, and 96,344 of them — 80.3% — are not in the City of Bradenton. Among commercial parcels it is 72.1%.
If you take the postal city as the jurisdiction anywhere in this market, you will be wrong most of the time, and you will be wrong in the direction that sends you to the wrong planning office.
Florida’s own revenue department says so in writing. Its User’s Guide for the Address/Jurisdiction Database states that “the ‘City’ name does not equate to ‘Jurisdiction’” and “only denotes the mailing city associated with the ZIP code and should not be used to determine the taxing jurisdiction of the address.”
Florida Department of Revenue, DR-700002.
What the cap does not cover, measured
Manatee publishes what Sarasota does not: the school and non-school assessed values as separate columns. So the point the cap conceals can be measured rather than inferred.
Across those 7,277 commercial parcels, non-school assessed value totals 94.8% of just value — the 10% cap doing its work. School assessed value totals 100.0%. 7,255 of 7,277 parcels — 99.7% — carry a school assessed value exactly equal to just value. $506.8m of value is sheltered from county levies and fully exposed to school millage.
That is the same mechanism the Miami bill above ran into, counted across a whole county. The cap shelters part of your bill. It is not a cap on your bill.
The Rome Ave parcel shows it locally. On the roll, account 6656500003 carries a just value of $2,029,678, a school assessed value of exactly the same $2,029,678, and a non-school assessed value of $1,646,098 — $383,580 sheltered from county levies on one building and fully exposed to school millage. The Manatee Tax Collector’s record for the same account, which is not part of the roll, runs 28 rows, one per tax year: the bill was $18,642.08 for 2018 and $34,282.20 for 2025 — up 84% in seven years on a property that has not changed hands since 2002.
No sale, no reset, no cap breach. Just the part of the bill the cap never covered, compounding.
Roll figures from the DOR file cited above and reproduced by the script. Bill history and date of last sale from the Manatee County Tax Collector, retrieved 20 September 2026; those four figures are not in the bulk roll and the script does not reproduce them. The collector’s site gates every fresh session behind a terms-of-agreement screen.
Check it yourself
Manatee’s roll carries a Taxing authority code, and the appraiser publishes the code table that names each one and labels it city or unincorporated. Seven codes are municipal; the rest are not. It resolves every parcel with no geocoding and no guesswork.
The parcel card itself prints Jurisdiction outright. For 1302 Rome Ave it reads UNINCORPORATED MANATEE COUNTY while the situs address reads Sarasota. Read that field, not the address.
When you do this weekly
Four checks, every property, before you say a number out loud.
All four of these are catchable by hand. The guide below shows you how, and the worksheet is free. It takes about twenty minutes a property across nine portals, two of which will show you a security check.
Glove does the same digging in one call, inside Claude Code, Cursor or Codex — parcel, the value type the county reports with its year, last sale, zoning, flood and city limits, each number carrying the page it came from. Recorded documents and permits are still yours to click.
Five free packets. Each successful packet uses one credit.
Works in Claude Code, Cursor and Codex.
Method, and what these counts do not establish
Source
One file: SCPA_Parcels_Sales_CSV.zip, published by the Sarasota County Property Appraiser on its Download Data page for public querying. Members used: Parcel_Sales_CSV/Sarasota.csv (parcels and values) and Parcel_Sales_CSV/ParcelSales.csv (recorded sales), with QualificationCodes.csv for the code descriptions. The file carried a last-modified date of 18 September 2026, 10:00 GMT. It was downloaded and counted on 19 September 2026.
Manatee source
Florida Department of Revenue, PTO Data Portal, Tax Roll Data Files: Manatee 51 Preliminary NAL 2026.zip (member NAL51P202601.csv) and Manatee 51 Preliminary SDF 2026.zip (member SDF51P202601.csv). Manatee is DOR county 51. The files carried last-modified stamps of 27 July 2026, 11:06 GMT and 11:03 GMT. They were downloaded and counted on 20 September 2026. It is the 2026 preliminary roll; values move at certification.
The Manatee County Property Appraiser publishes the same two files, as PUBLIC_NAL.CSV and PUBLIC_SDF.CSV on its tax roll data page. Those are rebuilt nightly and carry no version, so a reader cannot get back to the file behind a published number. The DOR copies are static and dated, so they can be cited and re-fetched, and they carry every column these findings need. Every Manatee figure here comes from the DOR copies.
Update, 25 October 2026. On 6 October 2026 the DOR replaced the preliminary files with the final 2026 roll, Manatee 51 Final NAL 2026.zip and Manatee 51 Final SDF 2026.zip (members NAL51F202601.csv and SDF51F202601.csv), and the preliminary files can no longer be downloaded. Counted again on the final files with the same script: 522 of 965 commercial sales since 2025 were not qualified (54.1%, against 55.5% on the preliminary roll), 334 were recorded at $100 or less (34.6%), 2,837 of 7,346 commercial parcels were assessed below 99% of just value (38.6%), and all 922 commercial parcels with a Sarasota address are still unincorporated. The figures above stay as counted on 20 September; the final-roll counts are rows prefixed manatee_final_ in the CSV.
Jurisdiction comes from TAX_AUTH_CD against the appraiser’s own tax district code table, which labels every code: seven codes on the real property roll carry a municipal type (CITY or SPECIAL CITY DIST) and the rest do not. An eighth municipal code, 0020, is tangible personal property and never appears in the NAL. The split it produces is 41,703 incorporated of 236,531, or 17.6%. The county’s own 2026 preliminary taxing authority report gives 41,778 incorporated of 237,393 real property parcels — also 17.6%. The DOR extract carries 862 fewer rows than that report and 876 fewer than the county’s nightly file did on 20 September; the shortfall is spread across every taxing authority at roughly a third of a percent and changes no commercial figure on this page.
Manatee’s sale file holds one roll cycle — 2025 and 2026 only — not a sales history. Sarasota’s holds a history. Where the two counties are compared, both are cut to 2025 onward and the page says so; the 2024-onward Sarasota figures are not comparable to Manatee and are not presented as if they were.
The county’s terms of use state the roll “was compiled and maintained … for the sole purpose of creating the annual property tax roll” and “may not be appropriate or suitable for any other use”, and that land use codes “are not zoning designations”. They also name web scraping as grounds for terminating access; the bulk files used here are the published alternative.
Definitions
- What is left out — the Department of Revenue groups use code 003, multi-family of ten units or more, under Commercial. The counts here use 010–049 and so exclude it: 216 parcels in Sarasota, 243 in Manatee. Apartment buildings of that size are commercial property by most readings, including the Department’s own; they are outside these figures.
- Assessed and taxable — the file publishes one of each without naming the basis. The 10% cap applies only to non-school levies, and no counted parcel sits above just value, so these are the non-school figures. School levies are computed on just value.
- Live parcel — a row whose
StatusbeginsOPEN. 304,544 of 325,522 rows. - Commercial or industrial — Department of Revenue use code 1000–4999, as printed in
STCD. 10,934 live parcels. - Qualified sale — qualification codes 01–07. (Code 0 is a pre-2009 value and does not occur in this window.) Everything else is counted as not qualified, including the 57 rows coded 99, decision pending.
- Address key — house number, street name and situs city, compared with the direction removed. Manatee writes its direction as a suffix (
4208 1ST AVE W) where Sarasota keeps it in a separate prefix column; 1,892 Manatee keys carry two or more directions and 4,993 parcels sit behind them.
What this is not
- It is a count of what one certified roll printed on one date. Values, codes and statuses change; the roll is revised; a later file will not reproduce these numbers exactly.
- A disqualification code means the appraiser did not treat the transfer as an open-market sale for roll purposes. It is not a finding about the parties and not a reason to doubt a deed you have read.
- The assessed-to-just gap is an observation. The roll does not state the reason for any individual parcel's gap, and this page does not assign one.
- Nothing here is a survey, a valuation, a title search, a zoning determination or a permission for a proposed use. The Municipality field is the appraiser's classification; confirm authority with the office that holds it.
- No owner name, mailing address, grantor, grantee or legal description is reproduced. The county's file contains all of them; this study publishes aggregate counts and two account numbers that are already public on the appraiser's own search.
Reproduce it
The script that produces every figure above is on this page: count_sarasota.py. It counts both counties. Standard library Python, no install step. Run it with no arguments and it fetches both rolls and counts them; hand it rolls you already have and it counts those instead. It reads only the columns named in the definitions above, and prints only aggregates. The four Rome Ave tax-bill figures are the one exception: they come from the Tax Collector’s web record rather than the roll, and the script says so where it prints that parcel.
The published figures come from the file dated 18 September 2026. The roll is revised continuously, so a later file will not reproduce them exactly — that is expected, and it is why every number on this page carries its date. What should reproduce is the method.
Reuse
The counts are published as a CSV with the source, date and denominators attached to every figure. Free to reuse with attribution and a link. If you reproduce a number, reproduce its date with it.
Cite this study
APA
Klebl, C. (2026). Four traps in the Sarasota County commercial property record, counted. Sterling Digital Partners. Retrieved from https://glvtl.com/field-study/sarasota-commercial-record/Chicago
Klebl, Chris. “Four traps in the Sarasota County commercial property record, counted.” Sterling Digital Partners, field study No. 01, 19 September 2026. https://glvtl.com/field-study/sarasota-commercial-record/
BibTeX
@misc{klebl2026sarasota,
author = {Klebl, Chris},
title = {Four traps in the Sarasota County commercial property record, counted},
howpublished = {Sterling Digital Partners, field study No. 01},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
url = {https://glvtl.com/field-study/sarasota-commercial-record/},
note = {Data CC BY 4.0}
}
Wikipedia
{{cite web |last=Klebl |first=Chris |title=Four traps in the Sarasota County commercial property record, counted |url=https://glvtl.com/field-study/sarasota-commercial-record/ |publisher=Sterling Digital Partners |date=19 September 2026}}Link to it
<a href="https://glvtl.com/field-study/sarasota-commercial-record/">Four traps in the Sarasota County commercial property record</a>, Chris Klebl, Sterling Digital Partners, 2026.Embed a chart
<a href="https://glvtl.com/field-study/sarasota-commercial-record/">
<img src="https://glvtl.com/assets/field-study-01-sales-qualification.svg" alt="Horizontal bar chart of Sarasota commercial sales by qualification code since January 2024. Code 01, qualified by deed examination, 934. Code 11, corrective, quit claim or tax deed, 735. Code 05, qualified multiple parcels, 295. Code 30, affiliated parties, 91. Code 16, partial interest, 58. Code 99, decision pending, 57. Code 02, qualified by evidence, 55. Code 37, not exposed to open market, 35." width="720" height="548">
</a>
<p><a href="https://glvtl.com/field-study/sarasota-commercial-record/">Source: Sterling Digital Partners, field study No. 01</a></p>The three charts are free to embed; each carries its own snippet above. The counts CSV and the script are published under CC BY 4.0 — reuse them anywhere with a link back.
Looking up a record in this market yourself? The Sarasota and Manatee records directory lists every official source we have checked there, with the date it was last checked and what trips people up.
Corrections
If a count looks wrong, or a code description has changed, tell us with the metric name and the public source. We will re-run it and re-date the page. Every study is re-counted annually, and immediately whenever someone reports a figure wrong. Do not send private client information.
Corrected 22 September 2026. The 1,054 sales first described as carrying a disqualification code include 57 whose qualification is still pending (code 99). The figure is unchanged; the wording now says they carry a code other than qualified.
Next
This is the first of ten, and it now covers both counties of its market. Study No. 02 counts Miami-Dade. Four metros remain — Austin, Huntsville, Atlanta and Dallas–Fort Worth — and we are working through them. The method is in the field guide. The counted figures behind the series are collected in the statistics hub. A note on the dates, because a reader checking them deserves one: the first five studies were counted and published together, on 19 and 20 September 2026, rather than one a month across a year. The numbering is the order they were built in, not a publication cadence.
Know when your market lands
One email from Sterling Digital Partners when that market’s study is published.